A Letter To The Editor
I have just finished reading
Issue 55/56 of Fig Leaf Forum — the "Great Debate" issue. I read it carefully,
and I appreciate all the effort you put into not only the debate but the
work involved in putting that issue together. Thank you!
The five questions posed
by Mr. Roberts at the end of his Second Affirmative are good ones. May
I give my answers?
1. How can nudists
be sure they won't lust at a nudist camp? They can't. How can any
Christian anywhere of any persuasion be sure they won't lust at a Christian
camp, at church, at the mall, at school, at work, at home watching TV,
or ANYWHERE?
2. How can nudists
be sure they are not causing someone to lust after them? They can't.
How can any Christian anywhere be sure they are not causing someone to
lust? Joseph (a handsome man according to Genesis 39.6) was sold into slavery
and despite being appropriately dressed (Genesis 39.12), Potiphar's wife
lusted after him. No one will ever know how many pastor's wives (or pastors
themselves in their three-piece suits) are the objects of lust even though
they are modestly dressed. No offense intended, but Wheel of Fortune's
Vanna White would probably be an object of lust even dressed in a Salvation
Army uniform or as an ordinary housewife.
3. How can nudists
be an influence for Christ when so many believe their behavior is immoral
or wrong? Nudists who are truly born again, who have Jesus Christ
as their Lord and Savior, have been sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise
(Ephesians 1.7). They walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit because
they know that there is therefore now no condemnation to
them that are in Christ Jesus (Romans 8.1).
As I write this letter [June,
2000] the Southern Baptist Convention is meeting in Orlando FL. They have
voted by an over-whelming majority to reword their Statement of Beliefs
to exclude women in the role of pastor, believing that only men are so
called. What do you think the secular world's reaction to that
is going to be? It won't be positive or affirming or uplifting in
their minds. Therefore, how can Southern Baptists "be an influence for
Christ when so many believe their behavior is immoral or wrong?" True believers,
those who truly belong to Jesus Christ because they have been washed by
the regeneration (Titus 3.4-7), have a sworn enemy (Ephesians 6.10-18)
whose sole purpose is to cause problems for and wreak havoc among the saints
of God. It's my guess that our enemy doesn't care one bit whether a Christian
is dressed or nude.
4. What passage would
suggest that nudism is desirable or helps one serve God? There
is to my knowledge no such passage. Conversely, there is to my knowledge
no such passage absolutely and plainly forbidding nudism. Romans 14 is
not
an absolute forbiddance of nudism, nor of eating meat, drinking alcoholic
beverages, smoking, having church on Sunday or a whole lot of other things.
It is an exhortation for the strong to be loving and considerate towards
the weak while in their presence. Ephesians 6.10 is an exhortation
for all believers to be
strong in the Lord.
5. What can you get
from being naked around others that you cannot receive from being naked
privately in your own home? Look at Hebrews 10.25: "Let us not
give up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but let us
encourage one another — and all the more as you see the Day approaching."
What do you get from being a Christian around others that you cannot receive
by being a Christian privately in your own home?
I'm a Southern Baptist church
member. I am also a nudist, as are my wife, two sons and daughter. All
Christians are to go into all the world and preach the Gospel
to every creature (Mark 16.15). There's no clause exempting
nudists and nudist camps.
Editor's Note: After the debate about social nudism was published
in Issue 55/56 of Fig Leaf Forum and placed on the newsletter's Web site,
many readers took the time to write with their comments. The letter above
is representative of several that took up various challenges posed by Mr.
Roberts. It is from Issue 57 and has been slightly edited for space and
clarity.
This Web site is printer-friendly.
